Which term describes a property use that is allowed to continue despite a new zoning ordinance?

The term that describes a property use that is allowed to continue despite a new zoning ordinance is "nonconforming use." This concept applies when an existing property was legally used for a certain purpose under prior zoning laws, but when new zoning regulations are enacted, the existing use no longer complies with the current rules.

Nonconforming use is significant in real estate because it allows property owners to maintain their existing use even though the governing body has changed regulations that would typically prohibit such use. This ensures that owners are not unduly penalized for previously compliant uses and promotes stability in property values and communities.

In contrast, other terms in the question refer to different contexts related to zoning and property rights. A conforming use aligns with current zoning regulations, ensuring that the property meets all the requirements set forth by the local zoning ordinance. Variances refer to exceptions granted to property owners, allowing them to deviate from specific zoning requirements, but only under particular circumstances. Imminent domain denotes the power of the government to take private property for public use, which is not relevant in this context. Each of these terms plays a different role in real estate law and zoning practices, reinforcing the importance of understanding nonconforming use in relation to zoning changes.